• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Country Life In BC Logo

The agricultural news source in British Columbia since 1915

  • Headlines
  • Calendar
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
  • About
  • Archives
  • Contact
  • Search
  • Headlines
  • Calendar
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
  • About
  • Archives
  • Contact
  • Search

Primary Sidebar

Originally published:

MAY 2022
Vol. 108 Issue 5

Subscribe Now!

Sign up for free weekly FARM NEWS UPDATES

Loading form…

Your information will not be
shared or sold ever

Stories In This Edition

Greening up

On red alert

Ag show pivots to in person

Four options floated for flood mitigation

Sidebar: Four options; a lot at stake

Editorial: An enviable position

Back 40: A quarter century of gratitude and appreciation

Op Ed: Will food security be rooted in soil or software?

Province doubles vet school seats with funding

Ag council caps a year of changes, challenges

Thank you

Ag Briefs: Court offers no relief for mink farmers

Ag Briefs: Grape crop short and sweet

Ag Briefs: Gala winners

Vegetable sales remain strong

Vertical farms face regulation

Dahr steps down as AgSafe BC chair

Packers protest apple marketing commission

Egg farmers urged to register for compensation

Third round of replant money for raspberries

Raspberry prices show promise

Apiarists fear heavy winter losses

Sidebar: Genome BC partners with IAF to deliver new program

Strawberry levy to increase

Welcome back!

Thinking twice about digital marketing

Sidebar: Digital tips for farm marketers

Ranchers facing rangeland losses

Strong demand but uncertain feed outlook for beef

Farm News: The kids are alright

Blueberries need more than honeybees

Forum highlights made-in-BC ag innovation

Double-checking

Big data poses challenges and opportunities

Tiptoeing through the tulips

Business planning turns risks into opportunities

Three-fold growth marks hazelnut sector’s recovery

OrganicBC undertakes structural review

Growth surges in specialty mushrooms

Sidebar: Mushroome xports take top spot

Chilliwack plowing match marks its centennial

Woodshed: Kenneth’s encounter with nature goes sideways

Research: Research shows lack of data on butter hardness

Jude’s: Brunch for special people

More Headlines

Follow us on Facebook

Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons

2 hours ago

BC Supreme Court has blocked an attempt by remaining BC Tree Fruits Cooperative members to amend a rule that would have excluded former members from receiving their share of the co-op’s remaining assets. In her ruling, Justice Miriam Gropper called the bid to amend Rule 125, which would allow 32% of the surplus to be distributed among former members based on tonnage shipped to the co-op during its last six years of operation, “oppressive and unfairly prejudicial.” The co-op closed in July 2024, and remaining assets are estimated at between $12 and $15 million.

#BCAg
... See MoreSee Less

BC Supreme Court has blocked an attempt by remaining BC Tree Fruits Cooperative members to amend a rule that would have excluded former members from receiving their share of the co-op’s remaining assets. In her ruling, Justice Miriam Gropper called the bid to amend Rule 125, which would allow 32% of the surplus to be distributed among former members based on tonnage shipped to the co-op during its last six years of operation, “oppressive and unfairly prejudicial.” The co-op closed in July 2024, and remaining assets are estimated at between $12 and $15 million.

#BCAg
View Comments
  • Likes: 1
  • Shares: 3
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook

1 day ago

From our Country Life in BC family to yours, HAPPY FAMILY DAY!

Photo by Liz Twan

#BCAg
... See MoreSee Less

From our Country Life in BC family to yours, HAPPY FAMILY DAY!

Photo by Liz Twan

#BCAg
View Comments
  • Likes: 10
  • Shares: 1
  • Comments: 1

Comment on Facebook

🥰🐮🩷

3 days ago

Full-time students employed in BC agriculture during the summer season are eligible to apply for a bursary of up to $3,000. The bursary, administered by the Investment Agriculture Foundation, aims to increase youth and domestic seasonal worker employment in the ag sector. Funding is awarded on a first-come, first-serve basis. More information is available at tinyurl.com/5ef6pe3m

#BCAg IAF
... See MoreSee Less

Full-time students employed in BC agriculture during the summer season are eligible to apply for a bursary of up to $3,000. The bursary, administered by the Investment Agriculture Foundation, aims to increase youth and domestic seasonal worker employment in the ag sector. Funding is awarded on a first-come, first-serve basis. More information is available at https://tinyurl.com/5ef6pe3m

#BCAg IAF
View Comments
  • Likes: 13
  • Shares: 11
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook

4 days ago

BC fruit and vegetable farmers are being asked to share their views on farming technology in a 10-minute survey from Royal Roads University and the University of the Fraser Valley. The survey looks at how fruit and vegetable farmers are adopting emerging farming technologies -- such as digital tools, “controlled environment agriculture systems” (greenhouses) and agri-genomics (DNA analysis) -- to cope with changing climate conditions. The survey takes about 10 minutes to complete, and participants will be eligible to win an assortment of $50-$200 gift cards.

insights.kaianalytics.com/s3/PAS2026
... See MoreSee Less

BC fruit and vegetable farmers are being asked to share their views on farming technology in a 10-minute survey from Royal Roads University and the University of the Fraser Valley. The survey looks at how fruit and vegetable farmers are adopting emerging farming technologies -- such as digital tools, “controlled environment agriculture systems” (greenhouses) and agri-genomics (DNA analysis) -- to cope with changing climate conditions. The survey takes about 10 minutes to complete, and participants will be eligible to win an assortment of $50-$200 gift cards. 

https://insights.kaianalytics.com/s3/PAS2026
View Comments
  • Likes: 5
  • Shares: 1
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook

4 days ago

The District of Coldstream is proposing the creation of farm property tax subclasses to distinguish between small-scale and large-scale farm operations. Currently, all farms are classified as Class 9 regardless of size or infrastructure needs. The district argues larger farms require more municipal services and should be taxed accordingly. It plans to pitch its proposal at the Southern Interior Local Government Association convention in Revelstoke at the end of April. Support there could escalate the discussion to the Union of BC Municipalities convention next September in Vancouver.

#BCAg
... See MoreSee Less

The District of Coldstream is proposing the creation of farm property tax subclasses to distinguish between small-scale and large-scale farm operations. Currently, all farms are classified as Class 9 regardless of size or infrastructure needs. The district argues larger farms require more municipal services and should be taxed accordingly. It plans to pitch its proposal at the  Southern Interior Local Government Association convention in Revelstoke at the end of April. Support there could escalate the discussion to the Union of BC Municipalities convention next September in Vancouver. 

#BCAg
View Comments
  • Likes: 12
  • Shares: 2
  • Comments: 11

Comment on Facebook

Which municipal services do they require more of? Even larger farms typically still have only one or possibly two dwellings. Most have their own well and septic, and I suppose it depends on location, but most rural properties don't have garbage pick up either. And whether 20 driveways or one join the road, the cost to plow that road is the same. I no longer live within a municipality so of course there could be costs I've overlooked that are contributing to the District's proposal.

Large farms put more back into the community too.

The larger farms are the only farms paying wages, allowing people to spend money in their communities, the beauty of a network of small business. Small farms more often then not, is a single transaction, a hobby. Large- buy feed, raise cow, calf is born, sell calf, pay wage(support livlihoods), buy fence posts, buy more feed and so forth. Feeding the community. Small- Buy feed, raise cow, kill cow, eat cow.

And this is why farmers left California. British Columbia is no different

I am not sure how to post the actual Resolution that Council Pat Cochrane put forward but here is the link to the special meeting they are holding to pass the resolution: www.coldstream.ca/government-bylaws/news-alerts/notice-special-council-meeting-3.

Why not find ways to bring in more business's and audit municipal spending and regulate short term rentals (because Coldstream has essentially zero places to stay technically, insane) instead of raising taxes arbitrarily because "bigger costs more"

Attending that meeting, they claimed that “large farms” use more municipal services, yet Cochrane consistently stated he was going after “smaller estate properties not actively farming.” This is not only contradictory but misinformed. It would take him but three door knocks before he learned that the “estate farms” not actively farming are typically leased to a larger conglomerate to maintain farm classification. “Rural living at its finest,” though it seems not a soul on council is well-versed in this wheelhouse. What’s worse is that they somehow don’t think it’s necessary to bring in a single subject expert before blindly tossing around recommendations and solutions to problems that don’t really exist—or at least not as they perceive them. Don’t get me started on their rhetoric comparing the value of class 9 properties to other residential classes, when even my 12 year old understands that the values are drastically different when one property can be subdivided, and an ALR property cannot. Forever to the left of the point.

They want to tax a large farm more? Do people realize that farmers aren't becoming rich. Also, a small or hobby farm isn't contributing much to the local economy or community. This doesn't make sense. If we don't support our farmers. We need them. We can't import all our food.

What bs. I can't do a water and sewer hook up for an agricultural building, (a farm vegie stand) on a 160 acre farm in downtown Kelowna because there is already one at the far end of the lot for the principal residence. What extra infrastructure would they be talking about. Our irrigation is by licensed ground water well put in, powered and serviced by me. Any change in tax code should be on farm estates that do bogus farm gate sales at the minimum requirement, not viable commercial farming enterprizes that employ and contribute economic benefits to so many other businesses

Instead of increasing property taxes on large farms, I think governments need to revise the threshold needed for a property to qualify for farm status. That threshold has not changed in over 20 years and many non farmers are taking advantage of the ridiculously low threshold that was intended for real farmers.

And then you tax the farmers more and wonder why food prices keep going up. Why is it that the only thing government does is find more reasons and ways to tax people?

View more comments

Subscribe | Advertise

The agricultural news source in British Columbia since 1915
  • Email
  • Facebook

Ranchers facing rangeland losses

Crown land significantly impacted by wildfires

Fire can benefit soils but it still takes time to recover, something BC ranchers with Crown range don’t have as they struggle to place cows this year. FILE

May 1, 2022 byKate Ayers

WESTWOLD – Ranchers in areas hit hard by last year’s heat dome, wildfires and drought shouldn’t count on rushing out on their rangeland this summer, cautions a professional agrologist.

Chris Wellman, a fence contractor and former range agrologist with the Vernon Forest District, says many herds may need to stick close to home this season pending an assessment of range conditions. “The problem with this whole thing about grazing now is that all the Ministry [of Forests] infrastructure has been taken out – all the pasture boundaries, the fencing, the water developments – [they] have been compromised because of the fires,” he says. “As far as getting cattle into these areas, it’s virtually impossible. You could do electric fencing, but the terrain doesn’t lend itself to that.”

Fires can benefit soils by returning nutrients and reducing future fire loads. However, they also leave soils susceptible to erosion.

“The soil has no structure at this time. It needs snow-press, it needs a year or two to establish and really get structure back in the soil,” says Wellman.

Pasture conditions depend on the severity of the wildfires in each area. The province may require that some ranchers take acreage out of their grazing rotations to allow the land to recover.

“I would think that you would be very lucky in these heavily impacted areas if there’s any grazing at all,” says Wellman.

Westwold rancher Russell Clemitson considers himself lucky to have grazing options. Even though 85% of his range was touched by wildfire last year, he will be allowed to turn out cattle, albeit a bit later than normal.

“They did a fire intensity analysis on it, and they said around 30% was blacked out. So, severely burnt and the soil is burnt and everything,” says Clemitson. “And then around 40% was moderately burnt and the rest of it was lightly burnt.”

As it stands, he has just enough feed for his 350 cows until the beginning of June, which is when he would typically put his herd on grass.

“Between the drought and flooding last fall, there is no feed available in BC to purchase. And if it is, it’s so overpriced that you can’t afford to buy it now,” he says.

Fortunately, after meetings with the BC Ministry of Forests and local First Nations, his cattle will be able to return to Crown lands further into June.

“Usually, they don’t let you go back for anywhere between one to four years.  They don’t like to see cattle back on these ranges [after fires],” says Clemitson. “I tried to explain to them that without summer range, five generations of ranching come to an end. … We don’t have any options.”

On one of his ranges, cattle can return at full stock with stringent management practices and he will delay turnout by up to two weeks.

“My other range also has a deferred turnout day to the middle of June rather than the beginning of the month, providing the grass is ready,” he says. To promote rangeland recovery, Clemitson will reduce his stocking rate to 60% of normal. “So, I still need to find a home for some cattle but I’m going to take 60% over 0%,” he says.

Ministry help

The impacts of reduced grazing options aren’t lost on ministry staff. Wellman says they have been doing everything they can to accommodate ranchers through the winter and know a difficult season lies ahead.

“[They’re] trying to find them programs, help them with hay or find other pastures that are vacant or other Crown tenures that are vacant. They are scrambling. It’s chaos,” he says. “It’s a really horrible situation that we’re put in. The Ministry of Forests is absolutely sweating every night trying to figure out how they’re going to help these guys. Those people are run ragged right now.”

In Clemitson’s case, the ministry is using electric fence units to keep cattle away from the blacked-out areas and off highways.

“We solely rely on the Crown ranges to keep our operations alive. I’m thankful that they’re letting us go back out there right afterwards. We are very thankful for the understanding and cooperation,” says Clemitson.

Wellman fears for large ranches that are short on feed and depend on grazing leases to feed their herds. If they can’t access their leases, that will effectively shut them off from natural feed and force them to buy forage. Some may choose to sell.

“Being put in this type of position – I wouldn’t want to be in their place,” says Wellman, who grew up on a ranch and knows the business first-hand. “It’s crazy. Some of these guys run substantial numbers. How are they going to feed these animals during the summer? Hopefully it rains all summer long or we’re going to be in trouble.”

At Lazy L Ranch in Merritt, the Lytton fire jumped the highway and affected the backside of one of the operation’s range units. The fire damage was minimal, but ranch co-owner Haley Rutherford is more concerned about drought for the upcoming season.

“We’ve already had to open up a couple little ponds that were dammed up to get some water flowing down the ditches to water stock,” she says. “Usually, we take some seasonal custom grazing cattle and we’re probably not going to do that this year.”

Rutherford and her family run 400 cows on over 3,000 deeded acres.

“The regular lack of water and drought is going to hurt us more than the fires did,” she says. And Rutherford is not convinced the province will accommodate upcoming water needs for livestock producers. For her to create off-site year-round watering, the government will require that she reallocate irrigation water to livestock watering and acquire alternate-use registration on their water licence.

“I don’t think they’re going to give anyone more water than what they’ve already got. There is no drought-proofing from that perspective,” says Rutherford.

Related Posts

You may be interested in these posts from the same category.

Wildfires rip through Southern Interior

Wildfire threat remains high

Ranchers face rangeland losses

Wildfire 2021: ‘They keep locals in the dark. That is really problematic.’

Don’t blame the wildfires

Wildfire state of emergency ends

Province announces wildfire recovery funds

Province pledges emergency funding

Record temps kill poultry

Wildfires spark emergency declaration

Livestock producers count losses

BC considers making premises ID mandatory

Previous Post: « BC agriculture shrinks
Next Post: Ruckle Farm managers honoured »

Copyright © 2026 Country Life in BC · All Rights Reserved