• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Country Life In BC Logo

The agricultural news source in British Columbia since 1915

  • Headlines
  • Calendar
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
  • About
  • Archives
  • Contact
  • Search
  • Headlines
  • Calendar
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
  • About
  • Archives
  • Contact
  • Search

Primary Sidebar

Originally published:

DECEMBER 2022
Vol. 108 Issue 12

Subscribe Now!

Sign up for free weekly FARM NEWS UPDATES

Loading form…

Your information will not be
shared or sold ever

Stories In This Edition

Ottawa dishes trade funds

I spy

New money for fruit growers

Regenerative ag tops Ag Days successes

Editorial: A winter’s tale

Back 40: Regenesis: the end of farming as we know it

Viewpoint: The challenges of BC ag industry advocacy

Senate report highlights the need for flood plans

More farms test postive for avian influenza

Ag Briefs: BC Turkey names executive director

Ag Briefs: Province rebrands short course

Ag Briefs: Growers Supply expands

Ag Briefs: Cattleliner accident

Economic outlook challenges farm margins

Farmer markets launch economic impact study

WALI delivers labour update to grapegrowers

Beekeepers abuzz about tech transfer program

New apple varieties may improve profits

UFV grows its berry research capacity

Bayer opens new canola seed production site

Island farmers identify challenges at summit

Consumer demand key to local food production

Comox Valley ag plan undergoes overhaul

Salt Spring Abattoir marks 10th anniversary

Ranchers undertake living lab project

Copper deficiency challenges BC bison productivity

Bison ranchers briefed on emergency protocols

SWBC hires a new program manager

Sidebar: How does certification benefit producers?

Better communcation markted wildfire season

Sidebar: Government extends extreme weather support

Retail partnerships add value to small farms’ production

Research: Researchers barcode bacteria to fight farting cattle

Young butchers make their mark

Farm Story: Shot nerves are the price of success this year

Reduced water use doesn’t hurt cherries

Woodshed: Kenneth explores the old Corbett farm

Family farm finds new markets by diversification

Jude’s Kitchen: Festive flatbreads, dips & spreads

More Headlines

Follow us on Facebook

Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons

3 hours ago

BC Supreme Court has blocked an attempt by remaining BC Tree Fruits Cooperative members to amend a rule that would have excluded former members from receiving their share of the co-op’s remaining assets. In her ruling, Justice Miriam Gropper called the bid to amend Rule 125, which would allow 32% of the surplus to be distributed among former members based on tonnage shipped to the co-op during its last six years of operation, “oppressive and unfairly prejudicial.” The co-op closed in July 2024, and remaining assets are estimated at between $12 and $15 million.

#BCAg
... See MoreSee Less

BC Supreme Court has blocked an attempt by remaining BC Tree Fruits Cooperative members to amend a rule that would have excluded former members from receiving their share of the co-op’s remaining assets. In her ruling, Justice Miriam Gropper called the bid to amend Rule 125, which would allow 32% of the surplus to be distributed among former members based on tonnage shipped to the co-op during its last six years of operation, “oppressive and unfairly prejudicial.” The co-op closed in July 2024, and remaining assets are estimated at between $12 and $15 million.

#BCAg
View Comments
  • Likes: 2
  • Shares: 4
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook

1 day ago

From our Country Life in BC family to yours, HAPPY FAMILY DAY!

Photo by Liz Twan

#BCAg
... See MoreSee Less

From our Country Life in BC family to yours, HAPPY FAMILY DAY!

Photo by Liz Twan

#BCAg
View Comments
  • Likes: 10
  • Shares: 1
  • Comments: 1

Comment on Facebook

🥰🐮🩷

3 days ago

Full-time students employed in BC agriculture during the summer season are eligible to apply for a bursary of up to $3,000. The bursary, administered by the Investment Agriculture Foundation, aims to increase youth and domestic seasonal worker employment in the ag sector. Funding is awarded on a first-come, first-serve basis. More information is available at tinyurl.com/5ef6pe3m

#BCAg IAF
... See MoreSee Less

Full-time students employed in BC agriculture during the summer season are eligible to apply for a bursary of up to $3,000. The bursary, administered by the Investment Agriculture Foundation, aims to increase youth and domestic seasonal worker employment in the ag sector. Funding is awarded on a first-come, first-serve basis. More information is available at https://tinyurl.com/5ef6pe3m

#BCAg IAF
View Comments
  • Likes: 13
  • Shares: 11
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook

4 days ago

BC fruit and vegetable farmers are being asked to share their views on farming technology in a 10-minute survey from Royal Roads University and the University of the Fraser Valley. The survey looks at how fruit and vegetable farmers are adopting emerging farming technologies -- such as digital tools, “controlled environment agriculture systems” (greenhouses) and agri-genomics (DNA analysis) -- to cope with changing climate conditions. The survey takes about 10 minutes to complete, and participants will be eligible to win an assortment of $50-$200 gift cards.

insights.kaianalytics.com/s3/PAS2026
... See MoreSee Less

BC fruit and vegetable farmers are being asked to share their views on farming technology in a 10-minute survey from Royal Roads University and the University of the Fraser Valley. The survey looks at how fruit and vegetable farmers are adopting emerging farming technologies -- such as digital tools, “controlled environment agriculture systems” (greenhouses) and agri-genomics (DNA analysis) -- to cope with changing climate conditions. The survey takes about 10 minutes to complete, and participants will be eligible to win an assortment of $50-$200 gift cards. 

https://insights.kaianalytics.com/s3/PAS2026
View Comments
  • Likes: 5
  • Shares: 1
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook

4 days ago

The District of Coldstream is proposing the creation of farm property tax subclasses to distinguish between small-scale and large-scale farm operations. Currently, all farms are classified as Class 9 regardless of size or infrastructure needs. The district argues larger farms require more municipal services and should be taxed accordingly. It plans to pitch its proposal at the Southern Interior Local Government Association convention in Revelstoke at the end of April. Support there could escalate the discussion to the Union of BC Municipalities convention next September in Vancouver.

#BCAg
... See MoreSee Less

The District of Coldstream is proposing the creation of farm property tax subclasses to distinguish between small-scale and large-scale farm operations. Currently, all farms are classified as Class 9 regardless of size or infrastructure needs. The district argues larger farms require more municipal services and should be taxed accordingly. It plans to pitch its proposal at the  Southern Interior Local Government Association convention in Revelstoke at the end of April. Support there could escalate the discussion to the Union of BC Municipalities convention next September in Vancouver. 

#BCAg
View Comments
  • Likes: 12
  • Shares: 2
  • Comments: 11

Comment on Facebook

Which municipal services do they require more of? Even larger farms typically still have only one or possibly two dwellings. Most have their own well and septic, and I suppose it depends on location, but most rural properties don't have garbage pick up either. And whether 20 driveways or one join the road, the cost to plow that road is the same. I no longer live within a municipality so of course there could be costs I've overlooked that are contributing to the District's proposal.

Large farms put more back into the community too.

The larger farms are the only farms paying wages, allowing people to spend money in their communities, the beauty of a network of small business. Small farms more often then not, is a single transaction, a hobby. Large- buy feed, raise cow, calf is born, sell calf, pay wage(support livlihoods), buy fence posts, buy more feed and so forth. Feeding the community. Small- Buy feed, raise cow, kill cow, eat cow.

And this is why farmers left California. British Columbia is no different

I am not sure how to post the actual Resolution that Council Pat Cochrane put forward but here is the link to the special meeting they are holding to pass the resolution: www.coldstream.ca/government-bylaws/news-alerts/notice-special-council-meeting-3.

Why not find ways to bring in more business's and audit municipal spending and regulate short term rentals (because Coldstream has essentially zero places to stay technically, insane) instead of raising taxes arbitrarily because "bigger costs more"

Attending that meeting, they claimed that “large farms” use more municipal services, yet Cochrane consistently stated he was going after “smaller estate properties not actively farming.” This is not only contradictory but misinformed. It would take him but three door knocks before he learned that the “estate farms” not actively farming are typically leased to a larger conglomerate to maintain farm classification. “Rural living at its finest,” though it seems not a soul on council is well-versed in this wheelhouse. What’s worse is that they somehow don’t think it’s necessary to bring in a single subject expert before blindly tossing around recommendations and solutions to problems that don’t really exist—or at least not as they perceive them. Don’t get me started on their rhetoric comparing the value of class 9 properties to other residential classes, when even my 12 year old understands that the values are drastically different when one property can be subdivided, and an ALR property cannot. Forever to the left of the point.

They want to tax a large farm more? Do people realize that farmers aren't becoming rich. Also, a small or hobby farm isn't contributing much to the local economy or community. This doesn't make sense. If we don't support our farmers. We need them. We can't import all our food.

What bs. I can't do a water and sewer hook up for an agricultural building, (a farm vegie stand) on a 160 acre farm in downtown Kelowna because there is already one at the far end of the lot for the principal residence. What extra infrastructure would they be talking about. Our irrigation is by licensed ground water well put in, powered and serviced by me. Any change in tax code should be on farm estates that do bogus farm gate sales at the minimum requirement, not viable commercial farming enterprizes that employ and contribute economic benefits to so many other businesses

Instead of increasing property taxes on large farms, I think governments need to revise the threshold needed for a property to qualify for farm status. That threshold has not changed in over 20 years and many non farmers are taking advantage of the ridiculously low threshold that was intended for real farmers.

And then you tax the farmers more and wonder why food prices keep going up. Why is it that the only thing government does is find more reasons and ways to tax people?

View more comments

Subscribe | Advertise

The agricultural news source in British Columbia since 1915
  • Email
  • Facebook

Senate report highlights need for flood plans

Dairy farmers shore up emergency response

Sarah Sache, vice-chair of BC Dairy, acknowledges that emergency response planning could always be better. RONDA PAYNE

November 30, 2022 bySandra Tretick

CHILLIWACK – When dairy farmers on the flooded Sumas Prairie started evacuating their herds to buddy farms in November 2021, West River Farm in Rosedale took in eight bottle-fed calves.

“They were freezing cold,” recalls dairy farmer Sarah Sache. “They were in the water, so it took quite a lot of work to keep them alive.”

West River Farm was further from the flooded area, so its involvement in the buddy program was minimal, but still vital to the overall rescue effort. Dairy farmers lost 420 cows with losses totalling upwards of $100 million.

“[It was] definitely an emergency response unlike any other we have conducted in the past,” says Sache, vice-chair of the BC Dairy Association. “We’re working on planning for that more for the future.”

Other industry sectors did not fare as well. Official estimates in the aftermath of the flooding pegged livestock losses at 628,000 chickens and 12,000 hogs.

Johnny Guliker, owner of Trilean Pork, was one of the hog farmers directly impacted by the flooding. He shared his story with the Senate standing committee on agriculture and forestry as part of its investigation into the floods that overwhelmed the Fraser Valley.

“I got pretty well wiped out in this flood,” Guliker told the committee. “When you have a lot of things, animals and people you are trying to rescue, you always seem to do the wrong things.”

He described how they tried everything to save their hogs. They built walls to keep the feed dry. When the first set of dikes failed, they chased the smaller animals to the higher part of the facility. They had few resources left when the second dike broke on the other side of the flats.

“The water just came higher and all of them drowned,” Guliker explained. “Those were futile efforts.”

Guliker was the only producer directly impacted by the flooding who spoke to the Senate committee as it conducted hearings on four days between April and June. Other presenters included the BC Agriculture Council and five producer groups (chicken growers, broiler hatching eggs, blueberries, pork and dairy), First Nations, academics, engineering consultants and federal and municipal officials. All of the transcripts are available online.

On October 27, just as the Fraser Valley was bracing for its first atmospheric river this fall, the Senate released its report, Treading Water: The Impact of and Response to the 2021 British Columbia floods.

The report highlights the causes and impacts of the floods, support measures and lessons learned from the recovery efforts. It makes three recommendations: urging the federal government to work with the BC government and local municipalities to develop a comprehensive Fraser Valley flood plan, providing easy and timely access to natural disaster relief and coordinating with the US government on the management of transboundary waters.

“We heard that 87% of the dykes in Southern Mainland BC were in disrepair and 73% would fail just by water going over the top,” says senate committee chair Rob Black. “There’s significant work to be done. We hope those three recommendations will spur government on.”

Sache says the recommendations are consistent with BC Dairy’s perspective.

“It’s good to see [these] plain language recommendations that will help to put some of these pieces that are much needed for food security into the future into place,” she says. “Obviously, there’s still a lot of work that needs to go into it, but the report acknowledges that this is going to need to be across levels of government to get this done. I think that’s kind of the key takeaway. It’s not one level of government or one group’s situation to deal with. It’s going to be a collaborative, significant process that’s going to need to be ongoing always.”

Developing consensus

Steve Litke, director of water programs with the Fraser Basin Council, agrees.

“There is still a way to go in developing consensus on region-wide flood priorities,” Litke says. “Some guidance may come from a new BC flood strategy, which is now in development and expected next spring.”

Litke says that many communities rely on flood protection dikes as a primary defence, and most of those dikes don’t meet current provincial standards for height or seismic resilience.

“Significant upgrades across the region will be needed for dikes to be effective in a large flood event,” he adds.

Government estimates developed in consultation with industry put the cost of flood-related damages to Fraser Valley farmers at $285 million. Monica Mannerstrӧm, an engineer with Northwest Hydraulic Consultants, further added that damages “would be at least tenfold” should the Fraser River overflow its banks.

The Fraser Basin Council estimates $1 billion of direct impact to the Fraser Valley’s agricultural sector if flooding were similar to the 1894 freshet.

Federal agriculture minister Marie-Claude Bibeau thanked the Senate committee for its study and acknowledged that recent extreme weather events, like the BC floods, have allowed the federal government to learn and improve its processes.

“In collaboration with the provinces, we have made improvements to the business risk management programs and all have supported the idea of incorporating climate risk in the future,” Bibeau says in a statement e-mailed to Country Life in BC. “In addition to the great resilience of producers and their willingness to build back better, what I retain from these disasters is the great collaboration between the affected provinces and the federal government, which allows programs to be deployed quickly.”

Quickly is a subjective term. Many of the producer groups raised concerns about how long it took for payments to flow to producers.

In an interview with Country Life in BC before the Senate report was released, BC agriculture minister Lana Popham acknowledged that a similar flooding event could easily happen again this year.

“We’ve been working with the associations and trying to support them as they shore up their emergency preparedness response plans,” said Popham. “We expect things to happen again. And so we’re trying to help producers prepare.”

She highlighted BC Dairy’s tabletop exercise, and their work on developing an inventory of livestock transport and suggested moving cows to buddy farms or areas of higher ground earlier in an emergency scenario.

In an e-mail , the BC Ministry of Forests noted that the province continues to work alongside First Nations, local governments and other partners to reduce flood risk in the Fraser Valley and that many components toward a comprehensive plan for flood mitigation have been advanced through work on the Lower Mainland Flood Management Strategy.

In March, former premier John Horgan and Washington State governor Jay Inslee announced a transboundary initiative to respond to Nooksack River flooding. Two technical site visits took place in July and September.

As the one-year anniversary of the flood approached, the BC Ministry of Transportation announced the reopening of Hwy 8 to all vehicle traffic, once again connecting Spences Bridge and Merritt, and Mike Farnworth, Minister of Public Safety and Attorney General, announced $1.6 million in Disaster Financial Assistance funding for permanent repairs to the Sumas River main dike. The work was expected to wrap up in November.

With files from Kate Ayers

Related Posts

You may be interested in these posts from the same category.

Task force presents blueprint for growth

Sumas flooding spurs call for action

Ag Days foregrounds sector priorities

Council calls for review of farm classification rules

BC distanced from TB concerns

BCAC holds AGM

Ag leaders honoured at gala

BC producer groups give back

BC farm income plummets

BC FIRB challenges WMP plans

AI risk for dairy discussed

Budget recognizes climate risks

Previous Post: « Avian influenza spreads
Next Post: COVID-19 response reviewed »

Copyright © 2026 Country Life in BC · All Rights Reserved