• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Country Life In BC Logo

The agricultural news source in British Columbia since 1915

  • Headlines
  • Calendar
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
  • About
  • Archives
  • Contact
  • Search
  • Headlines
  • Calendar
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
  • About
  • Archives
  • Contact
  • Search

Primary Sidebar

Current Issue:

FEBRUARY 2026
Vol. 112 Issue 2

Subscribe Now!

Sign up for free weekly FARM NEWS UPDATES

Loading form…

Your information will not be
shared or sold ever

Follow us on Facebook

Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons

3 hours ago

BC Supreme Court has blocked an attempt by remaining BC Tree Fruits Cooperative members to amend a rule that would have excluded former members from receiving their share of the co-op’s remaining assets. In her ruling, Justice Miriam Gropper called the bid to amend Rule 125, which would allow 32% of the surplus to be distributed among former members based on tonnage shipped to the co-op during its last six years of operation, “oppressive and unfairly prejudicial.” The co-op closed in July 2024, and remaining assets are estimated at between $12 and $15 million.

#BCAg
... See MoreSee Less

BC Supreme Court has blocked an attempt by remaining BC Tree Fruits Cooperative members to amend a rule that would have excluded former members from receiving their share of the co-op’s remaining assets. In her ruling, Justice Miriam Gropper called the bid to amend Rule 125, which would allow 32% of the surplus to be distributed among former members based on tonnage shipped to the co-op during its last six years of operation, “oppressive and unfairly prejudicial.” The co-op closed in July 2024, and remaining assets are estimated at between $12 and $15 million.

#BCAg
View Comments
  • Likes: 2
  • Shares: 4
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook

1 day ago

From our Country Life in BC family to yours, HAPPY FAMILY DAY!

Photo by Liz Twan

#BCAg
... See MoreSee Less

From our Country Life in BC family to yours, HAPPY FAMILY DAY!

Photo by Liz Twan

#BCAg
View Comments
  • Likes: 10
  • Shares: 1
  • Comments: 1

Comment on Facebook

🥰🐮🩷

3 days ago

Full-time students employed in BC agriculture during the summer season are eligible to apply for a bursary of up to $3,000. The bursary, administered by the Investment Agriculture Foundation, aims to increase youth and domestic seasonal worker employment in the ag sector. Funding is awarded on a first-come, first-serve basis. More information is available at tinyurl.com/5ef6pe3m

#BCAg IAF
... See MoreSee Less

Full-time students employed in BC agriculture during the summer season are eligible to apply for a bursary of up to $3,000. The bursary, administered by the Investment Agriculture Foundation, aims to increase youth and domestic seasonal worker employment in the ag sector. Funding is awarded on a first-come, first-serve basis. More information is available at https://tinyurl.com/5ef6pe3m

#BCAg IAF
View Comments
  • Likes: 13
  • Shares: 11
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook

4 days ago

BC fruit and vegetable farmers are being asked to share their views on farming technology in a 10-minute survey from Royal Roads University and the University of the Fraser Valley. The survey looks at how fruit and vegetable farmers are adopting emerging farming technologies -- such as digital tools, “controlled environment agriculture systems” (greenhouses) and agri-genomics (DNA analysis) -- to cope with changing climate conditions. The survey takes about 10 minutes to complete, and participants will be eligible to win an assortment of $50-$200 gift cards.

insights.kaianalytics.com/s3/PAS2026
... See MoreSee Less

BC fruit and vegetable farmers are being asked to share their views on farming technology in a 10-minute survey from Royal Roads University and the University of the Fraser Valley. The survey looks at how fruit and vegetable farmers are adopting emerging farming technologies -- such as digital tools, “controlled environment agriculture systems” (greenhouses) and agri-genomics (DNA analysis) -- to cope with changing climate conditions. The survey takes about 10 minutes to complete, and participants will be eligible to win an assortment of $50-$200 gift cards. 

https://insights.kaianalytics.com/s3/PAS2026
View Comments
  • Likes: 5
  • Shares: 1
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook

4 days ago

The District of Coldstream is proposing the creation of farm property tax subclasses to distinguish between small-scale and large-scale farm operations. Currently, all farms are classified as Class 9 regardless of size or infrastructure needs. The district argues larger farms require more municipal services and should be taxed accordingly. It plans to pitch its proposal at the Southern Interior Local Government Association convention in Revelstoke at the end of April. Support there could escalate the discussion to the Union of BC Municipalities convention next September in Vancouver.

#BCAg
... See MoreSee Less

The District of Coldstream is proposing the creation of farm property tax subclasses to distinguish between small-scale and large-scale farm operations. Currently, all farms are classified as Class 9 regardless of size or infrastructure needs. The district argues larger farms require more municipal services and should be taxed accordingly. It plans to pitch its proposal at the  Southern Interior Local Government Association convention in Revelstoke at the end of April. Support there could escalate the discussion to the Union of BC Municipalities convention next September in Vancouver. 

#BCAg
View Comments
  • Likes: 12
  • Shares: 2
  • Comments: 11

Comment on Facebook

Which municipal services do they require more of? Even larger farms typically still have only one or possibly two dwellings. Most have their own well and septic, and I suppose it depends on location, but most rural properties don't have garbage pick up either. And whether 20 driveways or one join the road, the cost to plow that road is the same. I no longer live within a municipality so of course there could be costs I've overlooked that are contributing to the District's proposal.

Large farms put more back into the community too.

The larger farms are the only farms paying wages, allowing people to spend money in their communities, the beauty of a network of small business. Small farms more often then not, is a single transaction, a hobby. Large- buy feed, raise cow, calf is born, sell calf, pay wage(support livlihoods), buy fence posts, buy more feed and so forth. Feeding the community. Small- Buy feed, raise cow, kill cow, eat cow.

And this is why farmers left California. British Columbia is no different

I am not sure how to post the actual Resolution that Council Pat Cochrane put forward but here is the link to the special meeting they are holding to pass the resolution: www.coldstream.ca/government-bylaws/news-alerts/notice-special-council-meeting-3.

Why not find ways to bring in more business's and audit municipal spending and regulate short term rentals (because Coldstream has essentially zero places to stay technically, insane) instead of raising taxes arbitrarily because "bigger costs more"

Attending that meeting, they claimed that “large farms” use more municipal services, yet Cochrane consistently stated he was going after “smaller estate properties not actively farming.” This is not only contradictory but misinformed. It would take him but three door knocks before he learned that the “estate farms” not actively farming are typically leased to a larger conglomerate to maintain farm classification. “Rural living at its finest,” though it seems not a soul on council is well-versed in this wheelhouse. What’s worse is that they somehow don’t think it’s necessary to bring in a single subject expert before blindly tossing around recommendations and solutions to problems that don’t really exist—or at least not as they perceive them. Don’t get me started on their rhetoric comparing the value of class 9 properties to other residential classes, when even my 12 year old understands that the values are drastically different when one property can be subdivided, and an ALR property cannot. Forever to the left of the point.

They want to tax a large farm more? Do people realize that farmers aren't becoming rich. Also, a small or hobby farm isn't contributing much to the local economy or community. This doesn't make sense. If we don't support our farmers. We need them. We can't import all our food.

What bs. I can't do a water and sewer hook up for an agricultural building, (a farm vegie stand) on a 160 acre farm in downtown Kelowna because there is already one at the far end of the lot for the principal residence. What extra infrastructure would they be talking about. Our irrigation is by licensed ground water well put in, powered and serviced by me. Any change in tax code should be on farm estates that do bogus farm gate sales at the minimum requirement, not viable commercial farming enterprizes that employ and contribute economic benefits to so many other businesses

Instead of increasing property taxes on large farms, I think governments need to revise the threshold needed for a property to qualify for farm status. That threshold has not changed in over 20 years and many non farmers are taking advantage of the ridiculously low threshold that was intended for real farmers.

And then you tax the farmers more and wonder why food prices keep going up. Why is it that the only thing government does is find more reasons and ways to tax people?

View more comments

Subscribe | Advertise

The agricultural news source in British Columbia since 1915
  • Email
  • Facebook

Cherries replant funding opens

BC cherry growers filed $44.7 million in production insurance claims last year. File photo

July 3, 2024 byTom Walker

Cherry producers will be able to apply for funds to support orchard renewal beginning July 9.

The funding is the third round of funding for the sector under the initial Perennial Crop Renewal Program announced in spring 2022, which was backed by $15 million of provincial monies for tree fruits, berries and hazelnuts.

Previous rounds funded opportunity assessments and removal programs that set the stage for replanting.

But demand was so strong those earlier streams could easily have expended the whole pool of funding.

“They were overwhelmed with applications and really all of that money could have been used just to pull out crops,” says BC Cherry Association president Sukhpaul Bal, who describes the program as “well-intended but quite short with the lack of funds.”

Happily, more funding is on the way.

The province announced an additional $70 million in funding this March as part of an “enhanced” program, but Bal is not sure how enhanced it is.

“We appreciate the funds, but the government didn’t consult with industry before they announced the new program,” he says. “I was hoping that ‘enhanced’ would provide us with funds for infrastructure to become more resilient to climate change, in addition to just replanting trees.”

Additionally, one program is not ideal for all growers.

“For grape growers whose vines are dead, they need to rip out and replant the whole vineyard, but that is not the same for cherry growers,” he says. “My trees didn’t all die, but I haven’t had a good crop for several years now.”
While he would like to renew his orchard with varieties resistant to the impacts of the more extreme weather seen in recent years, he doesn’t know of one.

This is also why he hopes the new enhanced program won’t be too prescriptive.

“[Our] association doesn’t feel comfortable telling people their business plan and saying don’t plant this, you can only plant that,” he says.

With the new program starting before the original one ends, he hopes growers who pulled out trees in the hopes of replant funding under the original program will be first up for funding under the new program.

“I hope that growers who applied but did not get approval for Stream 3 yet went ahead and pulled and replanted with their own funds will be able to receive retroactive support now that the program is better funded,” he says.

Administered by the Investment Agriculture Foundation of BC, the program is receiving applications from cherry growers through August 27.

The intake for cherries follows the opening for cranberry growers, whose funding applications are due July 3.

Related Posts

You may be interested in these posts from the same category.

Cherry growers focus on labour

Federal budget kills Living Labs

Peace prepares for active fire season

New replant funding announced

BC Cherry holds AGM

Cherry growers weigh trade complaint

Investment foundation grows

Cherry promotion promising

Irrigation

Water infrastructure, food security

FV flood protection funded

Replant program revamped

New rules for pesticide applications

Previous Post: « Veteran orchardist dies
Next Post: Gill shifts to greenhouses »

Copyright © 2026 Country Life in BC · All Rights Reserved