• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Country Life In BC Logo

The agricultural news source in British Columbia since 1915

  • Headlines
  • Calendar
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
  • About
  • Archives
  • Contact
  • Search
  • Headlines
  • Calendar
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
  • About
  • Archives
  • Contact
  • Search

Primary Sidebar

Current Issue:

MARCH 2026
Vol. 112 Issue 3

Subscribe Now!

Sign up for free weekly FARM NEWS UPDATES

Loading form…

Your information will not be
shared or sold ever

Follow us on Facebook

Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons

6 days ago

A BC Forest Practices Board investigation has found overgrazing has damaged grasslands in the Coutlee Range Unit near Merritt — and the range-use plan meant to prevent it was unenforceable. With complaints about overgrazing on the rise and grasslands covering just 1% of BC's land mass, the findings raise fresh questions about how the province manages one of its most vulnerable — and valuable — food-producing ecosyste#BCAg#BCAg ... See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

Board finds overgrazing rules unenforceable unmeasurable

www.countrylifeinbc.com

MERRITT – A BC Forest Practices Board investigation has found instances of non-compliance related to overgrazing have damaged open grasslands in the Mine pasture, part of the Coutlee Range Unit near...
View Comments
  • Likes: 6
  • Shares: 6
  • Comments: 6

Comment on Facebook

Several ranchers in recent years have gone into temporary non use on that range , so that means the grass should grow. But drought conditions/lack of rain and snow don’t allow that to happen . Dried up springs , creeks waterholes in various pastures add to over grazing where there is water , as livestock and everything else stay close to the water source . So even though less cattle are on it , over grazing appears. There is a large volume of horses on it 365 days/year which is wrong ! They pull grass right out of the ground when it’s just trying to grow ,, opens the door for weeds to grow in. That don’t help it. Aging infrastructure ( fences) laying on the ground, pipe line building , ( lack of commitment to fence maintenance) amongst all users contributes also to over grazing. Recreational atv users leaving gates open between pastures allows livestock to go back or ahead in pastures also expidites over grazing. Logging ( bcts) has no problem laying out cut locks on both sides of a fence , then it gets smashed down during logging and they don’t take responsibility to stand it back up or clean the cattle gaurds out when they are done , that happened 4 years ago on pasture 5 up there . I bet it is still not fixed . There are lots of contributing factors to the problem.

Tragedy of the commons.

I looked through the report. I saw nothing about the effects of noxious weeds on productive grasslands. This particular area is vulnerable because of the Ministry’a efforts to diversify the use of the Grasslands.

This pasture is under tremendous pressure not only from cattle but from irresponsible local residents who treat it as a landfill dumping all manner of household debris here. And don't even get me started on the mud bogging and camping in sensitive riparian areas. The feral horses are in this pasture 365 days a year just hammering it. Would sure be nice to see some enforcement action on people who are intentionally ripping up the grasslands and riparian areas. Cattle could be a valuable resource for rebuilding soils and native grasses in this area with the help of electric fencing and/or e-collars. The humans will be harder to manage.

The Forest and Range Practices Act was written by lawyers for global forest licencee shareholders. Results-based = unenforceable.

Also, can we talk about the impact of a pipeline being built through the middle of this field for multiple years?

View more comments

1 week ago

East Kootenay rancher Randy Reay is digging a new well after two natural water sources dried up on his Crown tenures. A new Living Lakes Canada assessment found 15% of mapped aquifers in the region are high-priority for monitoring, yet 80% of those go unmonitored. With over 48% of BC's provincial observation wells reporting below-normal groundwater levels, ranchers and researchers are sounding the alarm on water security. The story is in our March edition, and we've posted it to our website thi#BCAgk.

#BCAg
... See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

Water woes: groundwater under pressure across BC

www.countrylifeinbc.com

JAFFRAY – As a young boy growing up in the Kootenay-Boundary region, Randy Reay never expected to run out of water. But this year, in mid-February, his fields are bare. There is no snow halfway up t...
View Comments
  • Likes: 8
  • Shares: 7
  • Comments: 1

Comment on Facebook

Jaffrey is in the east Kootenays not kooteney boundary

2 weeks ago

BC farmers are bracing for prolonged higher input costs as war in the Middle East drives up fuel and fertilizer prices. Nitrogen fertilizer costs were already climbing before the Iran conflict began, with prices still roughly 60% above pre-pandemic levels. Farm Credit Canada warns that unlike 2022, strong commodity prices may not offset rising costs this time. Local suppliers expect supply challenges and further price increases ahead.

#BCAg
... See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

Fertilizer prices on the rise

www.countrylifeinbc.com

War in the Middle East has delivered a generational shock to energy prices, meaning BC farmers can expect a prolonged period of higher costs not just for fuel but also for fertilizer.
View Comments
  • Likes: 2
  • Shares: 1
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook

2 weeks ago

... See MoreSee Less

View Comments
  • Likes: 1
  • Shares: 0
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook

2 weeks ago

Cameron Stockdale is the new executive director of provincial farm safety organization AgSafeBC. Find out more in this week's Farm News Update from Country Life in B#BCAg#BCAg ... See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

New leadership at AgSafe BC

www.countrylifeinbc.com

Cameron Stockdale is the new executive director of provincial farm safety organization AgSafeBC, succeeding Wendy Bennett. Bennett left AgSafeBC in September 2025, following 12 years with the…
View Comments
  • Likes: 5
  • Shares: 1
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook

Subscribe | Advertise

The agricultural news source in British Columbia since 1915
  • Email
  • Facebook

Showdown looms over co-op’s surplus

A group of BC Tree Fruit Co-op growers are asking the BC Supreme Court to approve a special general meeting of members to vote on changing a rule that would see only current members receiving a share of the remaining cash assets in the co-op. Photo | Myrna Stark leader

July 23, 2025 byTom Walker

A year after the BC Tree Fruits Cooperative shut its doors, work towards winding up the operation continues.

While most of the assets have been sold, what happens to surplus funds leftover after its debts are paid remains a live issue.

Creditor payments are expected to be finalized by late August, leaving an estimated $17 million for distribution to grower members.

Co-op Rule 125 states that both current and former members are entitled to a portion of the surplus funds based on the tonnage they shipped to the packing house in its last six years of operation, 2018-2023.

However, those six years saw a good number of the co-op’s top growers end their contracts and take their fruit to other packinghouses in the hope of receiving better returns for their fruit.

The pool average payment system at BCTF did not favour growers who delivered high quality fruit. By some estimates, total bins delivered in 2018 were around 170,000 and that number fell to 74,000 in 2023.

Court documents indicate that current co-op members would receive about 68% of the surplus, while former members would receive 32%.

Amarjit Lalli represents a group of approximately 38 growers who want to change that rule so that only remaining members will be entitled to the surplus funds. They have asked BC Supreme Court to approve a special general meeting of members to vote on changing Rule 125. Only current member growers will be able to attend that meeting and cast votes.

“The remaining growers feel that those who left already made their money, and the responsibility of carrying the overhead cost for the organization was passed on to anyone that was left,” says Lalli. “So this was a double-whammy – we were paying higher overhead costs and getting lower returns.”

Part of the reason for those lower returns would be the lack of top-quality fruit sales to increase the co-op’s average.

Many of those who left were multi-generational farm families, years-long co-op members who invested in and contributed to the co-op’s success – and didn’t like where they saw it heading.

As one industry insider commented: “Many of those growers left due to the political infighting and mismanagement at the Coop that was dragging down the business.”

A ruling on the special general meeting is expected next week.

Related Posts

You may be interested in these posts from the same category.

BC Tree Fruits relaunch

Algoma comes to BC

New apple fills niche

Growers Supply property sold

BC Tree Fruits facility sells

BC orchard sector needs more than sales

Co-op assets on the block

BC Tree gets credit protection

BC Tree Fruits shuts down

Stabilization initiative yet to bear fruit

Cherry growers face smaller crop

BC Tree Fruits sells packinghouse site

Previous Post: « Biobest acquires North Vancouver’s Ecoation
Next Post: Regulatory hurdles threaten farm income solutions »

Copyright © 2026 Country Life in BC · All Rights Reserved