• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Country Life In BC Logo

The agricultural news source in British Columbia since 1915

  • Headlines
  • Calendar
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
  • About
  • Archives
  • Contact
  • Search
  • Headlines
  • Calendar
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
  • About
  • Archives
  • Contact
  • Search

Primary Sidebar

Current Issue:

MARCH 2026
Vol. 112 Issue 3

Subscribe Now!

Sign up for free weekly FARM NEWS UPDATES

Loading form…

Your information will not be
shared or sold ever

Follow us on Facebook

Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons

6 days ago

A BC Forest Practices Board investigation has found overgrazing has damaged grasslands in the Coutlee Range Unit near Merritt — and the range-use plan meant to prevent it was unenforceable. With complaints about overgrazing on the rise and grasslands covering just 1% of BC's land mass, the findings raise fresh questions about how the province manages one of its most vulnerable — and valuable — food-producing ecosyste#BCAg#BCAg ... See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

Board finds overgrazing rules unenforceable unmeasurable

www.countrylifeinbc.com

MERRITT – A BC Forest Practices Board investigation has found instances of non-compliance related to overgrazing have damaged open grasslands in the Mine pasture, part of the Coutlee Range Unit near...
View Comments
  • Likes: 6
  • Shares: 6
  • Comments: 6

Comment on Facebook

Several ranchers in recent years have gone into temporary non use on that range , so that means the grass should grow. But drought conditions/lack of rain and snow don’t allow that to happen . Dried up springs , creeks waterholes in various pastures add to over grazing where there is water , as livestock and everything else stay close to the water source . So even though less cattle are on it , over grazing appears. There is a large volume of horses on it 365 days/year which is wrong ! They pull grass right out of the ground when it’s just trying to grow ,, opens the door for weeds to grow in. That don’t help it. Aging infrastructure ( fences) laying on the ground, pipe line building , ( lack of commitment to fence maintenance) amongst all users contributes also to over grazing. Recreational atv users leaving gates open between pastures allows livestock to go back or ahead in pastures also expidites over grazing. Logging ( bcts) has no problem laying out cut locks on both sides of a fence , then it gets smashed down during logging and they don’t take responsibility to stand it back up or clean the cattle gaurds out when they are done , that happened 4 years ago on pasture 5 up there . I bet it is still not fixed . There are lots of contributing factors to the problem.

Tragedy of the commons.

I looked through the report. I saw nothing about the effects of noxious weeds on productive grasslands. This particular area is vulnerable because of the Ministry’a efforts to diversify the use of the Grasslands.

This pasture is under tremendous pressure not only from cattle but from irresponsible local residents who treat it as a landfill dumping all manner of household debris here. And don't even get me started on the mud bogging and camping in sensitive riparian areas. The feral horses are in this pasture 365 days a year just hammering it. Would sure be nice to see some enforcement action on people who are intentionally ripping up the grasslands and riparian areas. Cattle could be a valuable resource for rebuilding soils and native grasses in this area with the help of electric fencing and/or e-collars. The humans will be harder to manage.

The Forest and Range Practices Act was written by lawyers for global forest licencee shareholders. Results-based = unenforceable.

Also, can we talk about the impact of a pipeline being built through the middle of this field for multiple years?

View more comments

1 week ago

East Kootenay rancher Randy Reay is digging a new well after two natural water sources dried up on his Crown tenures. A new Living Lakes Canada assessment found 15% of mapped aquifers in the region are high-priority for monitoring, yet 80% of those go unmonitored. With over 48% of BC's provincial observation wells reporting below-normal groundwater levels, ranchers and researchers are sounding the alarm on water security. The story is in our March edition, and we've posted it to our website thi#BCAgk.

#BCAg
... See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

Water woes: groundwater under pressure across BC

www.countrylifeinbc.com

JAFFRAY – As a young boy growing up in the Kootenay-Boundary region, Randy Reay never expected to run out of water. But this year, in mid-February, his fields are bare. There is no snow halfway up t...
View Comments
  • Likes: 8
  • Shares: 7
  • Comments: 1

Comment on Facebook

Jaffrey is in the east Kootenays not kooteney boundary

2 weeks ago

BC farmers are bracing for prolonged higher input costs as war in the Middle East drives up fuel and fertilizer prices. Nitrogen fertilizer costs were already climbing before the Iran conflict began, with prices still roughly 60% above pre-pandemic levels. Farm Credit Canada warns that unlike 2022, strong commodity prices may not offset rising costs this time. Local suppliers expect supply challenges and further price increases ahead.

#BCAg
... See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

Fertilizer prices on the rise

www.countrylifeinbc.com

War in the Middle East has delivered a generational shock to energy prices, meaning BC farmers can expect a prolonged period of higher costs not just for fuel but also for fertilizer.
View Comments
  • Likes: 2
  • Shares: 1
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook

2 weeks ago

... See MoreSee Less

View Comments
  • Likes: 1
  • Shares: 0
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook

2 weeks ago

Cameron Stockdale is the new executive director of provincial farm safety organization AgSafeBC. Find out more in this week's Farm News Update from Country Life in B#BCAg#BCAg ... See MoreSee Less

Link thumbnail

New leadership at AgSafe BC

www.countrylifeinbc.com

Cameron Stockdale is the new executive director of provincial farm safety organization AgSafeBC, succeeding Wendy Bennett. Bennett left AgSafeBC in September 2025, following 12 years with the…
View Comments
  • Likes: 5
  • Shares: 1
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook

Subscribe | Advertise

The agricultural news source in British Columbia since 1915
  • Email
  • Facebook

Land Act firestorm

Crown land makes up 95% of BC’s land base and management – including land leases and tenure, the cornerstone of ranching in BC – is governed by the Land Act. File photo / Trudy Schweb

February 14, 2024 byTom Walker

The BC government is proposing changes to the Land Act that will affect how Crown land tenures are administered, but they have provided very little information on what those amendments will look like and that has cattlemen extremely concerned.

In early January, the BC Ministry of Water Land and Resource Stewardship (WLRS) began contacting stakeholders to offer online engagement sessions regarding proposed changes as to how Crown land would be managed in the province.

The government says its objective is, “a legislative amendment to the Land Act to enable agreements with Indigenous Governing Bodies to share decision-making about public land use.”

Crown land makes up 95% of BC’s land base, and management – including land leases and tenure, the cornerstone of ranching in BC – is governed by the Land Act.

Currently, those decisions are made solely by the provincial government in consultation with First Nations. The amendments would see decision-making shared with First Nations.

But what the changes are and how they will be developed is anyone’s guess. There has been neither a formal press release on the consultation nor an intentions paper as with other public consultations.

“The engagement session I attended on January 11 left me with far more questions than answers,” says Elaine Stovin, assistant general manager of the BC Cattlemen’s Association. “The government shared a short slide deck that provided no detail on the actual amendments proposed, or how shared decision-making would take place.”

That lack of information and how it might affect grazing tenures has sparked a firestorm across the ranching community.

“This is one of the biggest issues that has woken everybody up, and it’s a hill to die on for us,” says BCCA president Brian Thomas, a rancher in Okanagan Falls. “We have members contacting us constantly, but unfortunately we cannot give them any real information.”

Despite the fact that WLRS minister Nathan Cullen, spoke with BCCA general manager Kevin Boon by phone on the evening of February 2, and hosted a 90-minute Zoom call with the BCCA executive on February 6, ranchers remain in the dark.

“We are not really any farther ahead,” says Thomas. “The minister assured us that this would not affect our current tenures and more or less that there would not be a First Nations veto, but other than that we don’t have any more details.”

Cattlemen have called for a reset.

“I told Minister Cullen that the BCCA and our membership are against the amendments and anything pertaining to it, as there was no information on it,” Thomas says. “We stated that it is the wrong approach for the government to be taking and they should cancel it and rethink it.”

Related Posts

You may be interested in these posts from the same category.

Traceability reprieve for livestock

Lawsuits drive ranchers’ call for DRIPA’s repeal

Breathing new life into historic ranches

Province lacks reconciliation roadmap: ranchers

Cowichan title decision creates uncertainty

Crown land conflicts reveal policy gaps

Beef herd drops

Feed available but stocks low

Haida Aboriginal title recognized

Water stewardship metrics questioned

Drought preparations spring ahead

BC Cherry holds AGM

Previous Post: « Provincial nursery specialist appointed
Next Post: RCMP recruits 4-H youth »

Copyright © 2026 Country Life in BC · All Rights Reserved