• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Country Life In BC Logo

The agricultural news source in British Columbia since 1915

  • Headlines
  • Calendar
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
  • About
  • Archives
  • Contact
  • Search
  • Headlines
  • Calendar
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
  • About
  • Archives
  • Contact
  • Search

Primary Sidebar

Originally published:

APRIL 2020
Vol. 106 Issue 4

Subscribe Now!

Sign up for free weekly FARM NEWS UPDATES

Loading form…

Your information will not be
shared or sold ever

Stories In This Edition

Sheep labour

Growers scramble for workers

Province implements Bill 15

Farmers’ markets help communities recover

Looking ahead

Back 40: Food security demands out-of-box thinking

Viewpoint: Government needs to step up farm support

Groundwater bill causes confusion for Island farmer

Cannabis expansion goes up in smoke

Dairy producers surveyed on regulation impact

Institute keeps ALR changes on the front burner

Organic growers face mainstream competition

Egg producers reflect on productive year

Better together: Broilers, hating eggs collaborate

A job well done

Turkey growers see slow demand for birds

Dairy driving increase in semen sales

Beef conference BC-bound

Dairy producers rail against new transport rules

Beef industry looks beyond pandemic

Abattoirs required to cut back overtime

Tax credit review

Cattlemen take their concerns to Ottawa

Cattle sales an essential service

Funding will help farmers address nutrient runoff

Manure management guide updated for small-lot farmers

Potato growers optimistic

Hazelnut growers survey indsutry

Cherry growers focus on export opportunities

Weather woes drive cranberry yields lower

NFU highlights role for ag in climate crisis

Research: Reducing dairy production’s carbon footprint

Independent corn trials a priority for group

Silage management must be taken seriously

Brewing a local future

Orchardists urged to work smarter, not harder

Breakout sessions take growers deeper

Farm News: With spring comes a field of dreams

BCAFM considers Alberta vendors in border markets

Woodshed: Kenneth reaches a new low in the Bahamas

Authentic stories will resonate with consumers

Jude’s Kitchen: Food for holy days

More Headlines

Follow us on Facebook

Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons

2 hours ago

BC Supreme Court has blocked an attempt by remaining BC Tree Fruits Cooperative members to amend a rule that would have excluded former members from receiving their share of the co-op’s remaining assets. In her ruling, Justice Miriam Gropper called the bid to amend Rule 125, which would allow 32% of the surplus to be distributed among former members based on tonnage shipped to the co-op during its last six years of operation, “oppressive and unfairly prejudicial.” The co-op closed in July 2024, and remaining assets are estimated at between $12 and $15 million.

#BCAg
... See MoreSee Less

BC Supreme Court has blocked an attempt by remaining BC Tree Fruits Cooperative members to amend a rule that would have excluded former members from receiving their share of the co-op’s remaining assets. In her ruling, Justice Miriam Gropper called the bid to amend Rule 125, which would allow 32% of the surplus to be distributed among former members based on tonnage shipped to the co-op during its last six years of operation, “oppressive and unfairly prejudicial.” The co-op closed in July 2024, and remaining assets are estimated at between $12 and $15 million.

#BCAg
View Comments
  • Likes: 1
  • Shares: 3
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook

1 day ago

From our Country Life in BC family to yours, HAPPY FAMILY DAY!

Photo by Liz Twan

#BCAg
... See MoreSee Less

From our Country Life in BC family to yours, HAPPY FAMILY DAY!

Photo by Liz Twan

#BCAg
View Comments
  • Likes: 10
  • Shares: 1
  • Comments: 1

Comment on Facebook

🥰🐮🩷

3 days ago

Full-time students employed in BC agriculture during the summer season are eligible to apply for a bursary of up to $3,000. The bursary, administered by the Investment Agriculture Foundation, aims to increase youth and domestic seasonal worker employment in the ag sector. Funding is awarded on a first-come, first-serve basis. More information is available at tinyurl.com/5ef6pe3m

#BCAg IAF
... See MoreSee Less

Full-time students employed in BC agriculture during the summer season are eligible to apply for a bursary of up to $3,000. The bursary, administered by the Investment Agriculture Foundation, aims to increase youth and domestic seasonal worker employment in the ag sector. Funding is awarded on a first-come, first-serve basis. More information is available at https://tinyurl.com/5ef6pe3m

#BCAg IAF
View Comments
  • Likes: 13
  • Shares: 11
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook

4 days ago

BC fruit and vegetable farmers are being asked to share their views on farming technology in a 10-minute survey from Royal Roads University and the University of the Fraser Valley. The survey looks at how fruit and vegetable farmers are adopting emerging farming technologies -- such as digital tools, “controlled environment agriculture systems” (greenhouses) and agri-genomics (DNA analysis) -- to cope with changing climate conditions. The survey takes about 10 minutes to complete, and participants will be eligible to win an assortment of $50-$200 gift cards.

insights.kaianalytics.com/s3/PAS2026
... See MoreSee Less

BC fruit and vegetable farmers are being asked to share their views on farming technology in a 10-minute survey from Royal Roads University and the University of the Fraser Valley. The survey looks at how fruit and vegetable farmers are adopting emerging farming technologies -- such as digital tools, “controlled environment agriculture systems” (greenhouses) and agri-genomics (DNA analysis) -- to cope with changing climate conditions. The survey takes about 10 minutes to complete, and participants will be eligible to win an assortment of $50-$200 gift cards. 

https://insights.kaianalytics.com/s3/PAS2026
View Comments
  • Likes: 5
  • Shares: 1
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook

4 days ago

The District of Coldstream is proposing the creation of farm property tax subclasses to distinguish between small-scale and large-scale farm operations. Currently, all farms are classified as Class 9 regardless of size or infrastructure needs. The district argues larger farms require more municipal services and should be taxed accordingly. It plans to pitch its proposal at the Southern Interior Local Government Association convention in Revelstoke at the end of April. Support there could escalate the discussion to the Union of BC Municipalities convention next September in Vancouver.

#BCAg
... See MoreSee Less

The District of Coldstream is proposing the creation of farm property tax subclasses to distinguish between small-scale and large-scale farm operations. Currently, all farms are classified as Class 9 regardless of size or infrastructure needs. The district argues larger farms require more municipal services and should be taxed accordingly. It plans to pitch its proposal at the  Southern Interior Local Government Association convention in Revelstoke at the end of April. Support there could escalate the discussion to the Union of BC Municipalities convention next September in Vancouver. 

#BCAg
View Comments
  • Likes: 12
  • Shares: 2
  • Comments: 11

Comment on Facebook

Which municipal services do they require more of? Even larger farms typically still have only one or possibly two dwellings. Most have their own well and septic, and I suppose it depends on location, but most rural properties don't have garbage pick up either. And whether 20 driveways or one join the road, the cost to plow that road is the same. I no longer live within a municipality so of course there could be costs I've overlooked that are contributing to the District's proposal.

Large farms put more back into the community too.

The larger farms are the only farms paying wages, allowing people to spend money in their communities, the beauty of a network of small business. Small farms more often then not, is a single transaction, a hobby. Large- buy feed, raise cow, calf is born, sell calf, pay wage(support livlihoods), buy fence posts, buy more feed and so forth. Feeding the community. Small- Buy feed, raise cow, kill cow, eat cow.

And this is why farmers left California. British Columbia is no different

I am not sure how to post the actual Resolution that Council Pat Cochrane put forward but here is the link to the special meeting they are holding to pass the resolution: www.coldstream.ca/government-bylaws/news-alerts/notice-special-council-meeting-3.

Why not find ways to bring in more business's and audit municipal spending and regulate short term rentals (because Coldstream has essentially zero places to stay technically, insane) instead of raising taxes arbitrarily because "bigger costs more"

Attending that meeting, they claimed that “large farms” use more municipal services, yet Cochrane consistently stated he was going after “smaller estate properties not actively farming.” This is not only contradictory but misinformed. It would take him but three door knocks before he learned that the “estate farms” not actively farming are typically leased to a larger conglomerate to maintain farm classification. “Rural living at its finest,” though it seems not a soul on council is well-versed in this wheelhouse. What’s worse is that they somehow don’t think it’s necessary to bring in a single subject expert before blindly tossing around recommendations and solutions to problems that don’t really exist—or at least not as they perceive them. Don’t get me started on their rhetoric comparing the value of class 9 properties to other residential classes, when even my 12 year old understands that the values are drastically different when one property can be subdivided, and an ALR property cannot. Forever to the left of the point.

They want to tax a large farm more? Do people realize that farmers aren't becoming rich. Also, a small or hobby farm isn't contributing much to the local economy or community. This doesn't make sense. If we don't support our farmers. We need them. We can't import all our food.

What bs. I can't do a water and sewer hook up for an agricultural building, (a farm vegie stand) on a 160 acre farm in downtown Kelowna because there is already one at the far end of the lot for the principal residence. What extra infrastructure would they be talking about. Our irrigation is by licensed ground water well put in, powered and serviced by me. Any change in tax code should be on farm estates that do bogus farm gate sales at the minimum requirement, not viable commercial farming enterprizes that employ and contribute economic benefits to so many other businesses

Instead of increasing property taxes on large farms, I think governments need to revise the threshold needed for a property to qualify for farm status. That threshold has not changed in over 20 years and many non farmers are taking advantage of the ridiculously low threshold that was intended for real farmers.

And then you tax the farmers more and wonder why food prices keep going up. Why is it that the only thing government does is find more reasons and ways to tax people?

View more comments

Subscribe | Advertise

The agricultural news source in British Columbia since 1915
  • Email
  • Facebook

Abattoirs required to cut back overtime

Province’s meat inspection budget tightens

April 1, 2020 byTom Walker

KAMLOOPS – Provincially licensed abattoir operators have been put on notice that regular shifts for provincial meat inspectors must not exceed seven hours a day unless authorized by the province.

“I am asking that all slaughter establishment operators adhere strictly to the scheduled inspection services, which do not exceed seven hours per day,” Gavin Last, executive director of the province’s Food Safety and Inspection Branch, wrote in a letter to all provincially licensed slaughter plants on February 25.

Any overtime now requires Last’s personal, written authorization.

The inspectors are present for the duration of the slaughter process at class A and B plants to ensure food safety requirements are met. While their services cost BC abattoirs nothing, unlike in some other jurisdictions, it is a significant cost the province.

“Overtime hours represent a significant pressure on the meat inspection program’s annual budget,” Last wrote. “One way we can keep the cost of service predictable and affordable is to eliminate unnecessary overtime for [BC] Ministry of Agriculture meat hygiene inspectors.”

The letter came a week after the February 18 provincial budget, which slashed $2.3 million in funding from the agriculture science and policy budget. The funding improves “public health protection and consumer and retail confidence in the safety of British Columbia’s meat, seafood, and agrifood products through inspection.”

Last’s letter caught industry by surprise.

Nova Woodbury, executive director of the BC Association of Abattoirs, said the ministry didn’t consult industry on the directive.

“There was no consultation, no prior warning that this was going to be mandated,” she says. “The ministry budget has been cut and I get that, but this would have been less of a surprise to our members if we had worked together.”

Bonnie Windsor, assistant manager at Johnston’s Meats in Chilliwack, the largest provincially inspected meat processors in BC, had difficulties with the immediacy of the letter.

“I have a union contract that has an eight-hour shift for my 120 staff,” says Windsor. “It will take time for us to look at our entire operation and change staff and process flows.”

She also has animal welfare concerns.

“When you are dealing with live animals, stopping right at seven hours is not always an option,” she explains.

She notes that many meat processors in the province often run on weekends and statutory holidays in the run-up to holidays to meet demand.

“Johnston’s has not typically had issues with capacity and being able to service small individual custom farmers,” she notes. “However, with this change, it will negatively affect our ability to service them.”

But Woodbury and Windsor, who also serves as president of the abattoirs association, were able to meet with Last in early March and clear up some misunderstandings.

“Last did clarify that he does not expect reduction in overtime overnight,” Windsor says. “But plants cannot consider overtime to be a given and need to find efficiencies and spend responsibly.”

The meeting was able to clarify that the seven-hour shift does not include travel time for the inspector to and from the plant. They were also able to establish the difference between “operational overtime” and “planned overtime.”

“If a half-hour is required at the end of a day to finish with our animals, he is fine with that,” says Windsor. “As long as it is within reason and not a daily occurrence.”

However, plants need to give notice for planned overtime during busy seasons as early as possible, with a direct request to Last.

“The ministry does not have an issue with planned overtime at busy times of the year,” says Windsor. “But they will have little tolerance for overtime caused by poor planning or overbooking.”

Woodbury says she has no problem with improving efficiencies, but she hopes it does not affect an industry that is already struggling with capacity and staffing issues.

“I am disappointed that every effort of the current government does not appear to support the licensed and inspected abattoirs, but rather puts up more barriers,” she says. “The majority of the inspected abattoirs in BC are small rural businesses that support local producers and the agriculture community as a whole.”

Despite extensive review by the ministry, the industry has yet to receive guidance on its future direction.

A consultation in spring 2018 regarding Class D and E slaughter licences and produced a 96-page report.

The legislature’s Select Standing Committee on Agriculture, Fish and Food conducted hearings in June 2018 and released a 37-page report in September 2018 that included 21 recommendations for the industry.

In the summer of 2019, the ministry sought feedback from local governments on whether more D-class establishments were needed in the province, and then extended the deadline to October 2019. The ministry has yet to release the results of that consultation, and the lack of direction disappoints Woodbury.

“I hope that this does not deter new inspected meat plants from opening or existing plants to increase their capacity,” she says. “The demand for safe, local meat from BC consumers is growing.”

 

Related Posts

You may be interested in these posts from the same category.

Challenges linger for meat plants

Rethinking the concept for mobile abattoirs

Island farmers renew request for local abattoir

Meat inspection budget tightens

Province extends deadline for meat consultation

Ranchers to build beef brand

Ranchers set to meet

Cattle feeders bullish on packing plant

Prince George packing plant gets further study

Previous Post: « Funding will help farmers address nutrient runoff
Next Post: Dairy producers surveyed on regulation impact »

Copyright © 2026 Country Life in BC · All Rights Reserved