• Menu
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Country Life In BC Logo

The agricultural news source in British Columbia since 1915

  • Headlines
  • Calendar
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
  • About
  • Archives
  • Contact
  • Search
  • Cart
  • Checkout
  • Headlines
  • Calendar
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
  • About
  • Archives
  • Contact
  • Search
  • Cart
  • Checkout

Primary Sidebar

Originally published:

OCTOBER 2025
Vol. 111 Issue 9

Subscribe Now!

Sign up for free weekly FARM NEWS UPDATES

Loading form…

Your information will not be
shared or sold ever

Stories In This Edition

Shut down again

Corkscrew harvest

Groundwater consultation launched

Wineries cheer extension of support program

Editorial: Heads in the sand

Back 40: A generation lost for words

Viewpoint: Farm status should value more than profits

Abattoirs demand essential status for inspectors

Battle looms over fruit co-op’s assets

Ag Briefs: Country Life in BC reporting honoured

Ag Briefs: Mushrooms target of trade complaint

Foundation funds record number of ag projects

Community support helps flood survivors heal

Pat Tonn looks back on career building up youth

BC Fairs looks beyond cash crunch

Cowichan title decision creates uncertainty

Fair-thee-well

Ranchers on hook for water storage solutions

Virtual fencing revolutionizes rotational grazing

Islands Trust sidelines ag in policy statement

Reports back significant hazelnut potential

Sand boosts Delta cranberry yield

Farm Story: What I did on my summer vacation

Inspiring a new generation of farmers

Sidebar: Summerland Food Hub moves forward

New farmers breathe life into rural community

Sparks fly as Day at the Farm draws crowds

Woodshed: A newcomer takes Newt down memory lane

Evening for Ag raises thousands for youth groups

Jude’s Kitchen: Autumn uppers inspired by the season

All content on this website is copyrighted, and cannot be republished or reproduced without permission.

More Headlines

Follow us on Facebook

Comments Box SVG iconsUsed for the like, share, comment, and reaction icons

2 hours ago

Faith Folkerts from Woodlands 4-H Club in Langley got $5 per pound for her 150- pound market lamb Sid at the 2026 PNE 4-H Auction on Monday. Sid is a Charolais/Hampshire cross and Faith's second lamb project. Between both live animals and carcasses, the auction featured more than 30 swine, more than 30 lambs, four goats and 25 beef projects. High-selling beef project was Linden Hastie's grand champion. The 1,520-pound steer sold for $12/pound. #BCAgrs!

#BCAg
... See MoreSee Less

Faith Folkerts from Woodlands 4-H Club in Langley got $5 per pound for her 150- pound market lamb Sid at the 2026 PNE 4-H Auction on Monday. Sid is a Charolais/Hampshire cross and Faiths second lamb project. Between both live animals and carcasses, the auction featured more than 30 swine, more than 30 lambs, four goats and 25 beef projects. High-selling beef project was Linden Hasties grand champion. The 1,520-pound steer sold for $12/pound. Yowzers!

#BCAg
View Comments
  • Likes: 6
  • Shares: 0
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook

5 days ago

The province has extended its provincial state of emergency until August 29 as wildfire risk remains elevated across much of the province, particularly in the Okanagan. While thousands have returned home since the August 8 declaration, evacuation alerts and orders remain in effect in several areas. Government urges residents to stay prepared, review emergency plans and check EmergencyInfoBC.ca for updates.

#BCAg
... See MoreSee Less

The province has extended its provincial state of emergency until August 29 as wildfire risk remains elevated across much of the province, particularly in the Okanagan. While thousands have returned home since the August 8 declaration, evacuation alerts and orders remain in effect in several areas. Government urges residents to stay prepared, review emergency plans and check EmergencyInfoBC.ca for updates.

#BCAg
View Comments
  • Likes: 2
  • Shares: 0
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook

6 days ago

Chilco Ranch–Miller Ranches of Hanceville received the national environmental stewardship award from the Canadian Cattle Association at this week's Canadian Beef Industry Conference in Winnipeg. The fourth-generation ranch blends traditional values with modern innovation as it manages 1,000 cow-calf pairs of Hereford cattle across 170,000 acres. Rotational grazing, soil health improvement and careful land stewardship as well as advanced water-monitoring technology ensures sustainable ranch operations, while deep community involvement through 4-H and other organizations support future generations. You can read more of their story in the September issue of Country Life in BC, which goes to press next week. Photo | Facebook/Canadian Cattle Associat#BCAg#BCAg ... See MoreSee Less

Chilco Ranch–Miller Ranches of Hanceville received the national environmental stewardship award from the Canadian Cattle Association at this weeks Canadian Beef Industry Conference in Winnipeg. The fourth-generation ranch blends traditional values with modern innovation as it manages 1,000 cow-calf pairs of Hereford cattle across 170,000 acres. Rotational grazing, soil health improvement and careful land stewardship as well as advanced water-monitoring technology ensures sustainable ranch operations, while deep community involvement through 4-H and other organizations support future generations. You can read more of their story in the September issue of Country Life in BC, which goes to press next week. Photo | Facebook/Canadian Cattle Association

#BCAg
View Comments
  • Likes: 47
  • Shares: 5
  • Comments: 0

Comment on Facebook

6 days ago

The deadline to weigh in on BC's proposed food-processing rules in the Agricultural Land Reserve has been extended to September 18. Proposed changes would open nearly 1.3 million acres of protected farmland to food processors by allowing processors to build plants on Class 5-7 soil (and Class 4, in some cases) as long as 5% of inputs are grown in BC. Currently, all processors must source at least 50% of inputs from BC. The existing 50% rule would stay in place for Class 1-3 soils. The BC Agriculture Council, which has previously raised concerns that the proposal reflects a narrow set of interests, says it's still reviewing the details with its #BCAgrs.

#BCAg
... See MoreSee Less

The deadline to weigh in on BCs proposed food-processing rules in the Agricultural Land Reserve has been extended to September 18. Proposed changes would open nearly 1.3 million acres of protected farmland to food processors by allowing processors to build plants on Class 5-7 soil (and Class 4, in some cases) as long as 5% of inputs are grown in BC. Currently, all processors must source at least 50% of inputs from BC. The existing 50% rule would stay in place for Class 1-3 soils. The BC Agriculture Council, which has previously raised concerns that the proposal reflects a narrow set of interests, says its still reviewing the details with its members.

#BCAg
View Comments
  • Likes: 22
  • Shares: 26
  • Comments: 11

Comment on Facebook

Funny how they always release these proposals in August when most farms are working overtime.

Let’s use our brains for a moment and think about this. Let’s say I’ve got a farm in bc, where i grow a crop that I then turn into jam. I have a small window each year where my produce is ready. I turn it into jam. Now my jam becomes a big hit and people want it year round. The only way for me to produce outside of my fruit bearing window is to bring in fruit from other places. I’m supposed to let my investment sit idle for most of the year? You can extrapolate this to many things we grow in bc and have short windows where it is ready. Our goal shouldn’t be to make it harder for people to succeed. Maybe 5% is too low, but 50% means it’s going to sit idle.

The current rules actually say 50% from the farm or related farms (ie. in the same producer group). The new rule is 5% from BC. This would likely be good for abattoirs, and I'm sure wineries would be excited too. However, both thise enterprises can be located away from ALR land. The proposed regulations will do the opposite of supporting agriculture. They will foster the removal of farmland from protection, and the increased impoverishment of our food system.

emails can be sent here: AF.Minister@gov.bc.ca

5%? Yeah, that’s a big “no” from me… the whole point of allowing processing on farmland is to make farms more economically viable by increasing the market for their product.

Where is the link for input?

I find that 5% vs 50 % equation very unsettling. In this situation it is not 5% from the farm it is 5% from bc. The rest can come from anywhere else. This is fine for industry standards but does not help agriculture in bc. So if we are going to give up limited agricultural land for this endeavour it had should help farming in bc. Farmers are expected to use 50% of their own on farm product on alr. Farmers would continue to be expected to use 50% while processors need not grow anything nor support bc farms. This doesn’t pass the sniff test to me

5% that’s nothing and how long what happens then after 5 years it is 0% they are not going to say oh you need to shut down.

I am by far, no expert, but why would you even propose to build a plant on good farmland, isn’t that for growing a plant? You can build a plant on any ground. Reminds me of all the greenhouses built on prime soil, to me it reduces capacity and takes away from local farmers so big business can come in and take over.

Here is the link: news.gov.bc.ca/files/FoodProcessingALR_DiscussionPaperAug18_2026.pdf Taking input until September 18th. In my opinion, lowering the sources to just 5% does nothing to build food sovereignty which is what we desperately need.

This is such bs

View more comments

7 days ago

The province has just issued a new temporary protection order for the Salmon River, effective immediately, restricting irrigation water for forage crops such as hay, alfalfa, and corn. A previous order was issued on July 28 and rescinded on August 8 due to wildfire risk, but low stream flows persist, threatening over 200 spawning Chinook salmon in the watershed. Affected licence holders will be contacted directly. Drought support is available to farmers through the Ministry of Agriculture and Food. The province has invested $120 million in the Agriculture Water Infrastructure Program to support farmers facing water scarcity.

#BCAg
... See MoreSee Less

The province has just issued a new temporary protection order for the Salmon River, effective immediately, restricting irrigation water for forage crops such as hay, alfalfa, and corn. A previous order was issued on July 28 and rescinded on August 8 due to wildfire risk, but low stream flows persist, threatening over 200 spawning Chinook salmon in the watershed. Affected licence holders will be contacted directly. Drought support is available to farmers through the Ministry of Agriculture and Food. The province has invested $120 million in the Agriculture Water Infrastructure Program to support farmers facing water scarcity.

#BCAg
View Comments
  • Likes: 15
  • Shares: 9
  • Comments: 7

Comment on Facebook

Can someone explain why they irrigate during the day in the blistering heat. Would it be better to water early morning and at sunset?

200 fish over all the feed that grows in this valley wow that some expensive fish

Time to start new methods of agriculture, ive watched our ecosystem take a beating in my lifetime, iym not against any productivity of our economic development within our structures, really its not rocket science. Its just going to cost alot to change to a better, more viable solution. Banks and your intellectuals, wanna run this country with money, then quit, wasting it on ignorance. The solutions are all easy, just how much money, do we waste, and how much are we going to spend, on actually fixing the issues.

This is just an exceptionally dry year from low snow cap. It does happen!

Get your water off fly hills two big lakes off there Spa and author

And they continue to ignore CHASE CREEK....

The methods we have now are because settlers always saw what was excess resources in their eyes - the riches of the ‘New World’ have been used and abused and as the limits have been reached are in disbelief and still trying to push for more….when the problem is US and how settlers have always been about extraction and not living with and much less understanding the landscapes in their integration because the next crop is the horizon and there is no compassion for the land its flora and fauna because it needs to be remade in the settler image and naive ideal

View more comments

Subscribe | Advertise

The agricultural news source in British Columbia since 1915
  • Email
  • Facebook

Islands Trust sidelines ag in policy statement

Draft policy open for public comment until February 2026

Aerial image of Denman Island, Gulf Islands, BC, Canada

September 30, 2025 byRiley Donovan

PENDER ISLAND – A new draft Islands Trust policy statement that removes a key Agricultural Land Reserve  provision and no longer recognizes agriculture as a “traditional and valuable activity” is sparking concern among some in the Gulf Islands farming community.

The effort to update the current policy statement – which has been largely unchanged since 1994 – was launched in September 2019, deferred by trustees in July 2021, and is set to be finally completed in fall 2026 after a final round of consultations.

The latest draft of the policy statement, released in July, raises red flags for Pender Island Farmers Institute president Barbara Johnstone Grimmer.

Grimmer is “disappointed but not surprised” by the removal of the “traditional and valuable” designation for agriculture in the new policy statement.

She says it’s the latest instance of a much larger pattern of the trust’s disregard for the rural character of the islands.

“Islands Trust was based on ‘preserve and protect.’ For a lot of people, that meant preserving the rural lifestyle, what we do as rural people, which is largely farming. And it’s slid into more like preserving the environment,” says Grimmer. “They’re failing in their mandate, and I don’t think this trust policy statement helps.”

Grimmer emphasizes that, to her knowledge, there has been “no direct request” from the trust to gather perspectives on the draft policy statement from the local agricultural community.

In response to an inquiry by Country Life in BC, Islands Trust explained that the “traditional and valuable” designation for agriculture was removed as part of a decision to replace specific commitments in policy statement subsections with one page of broad “guiding principles.”

The decision, taken in 2022, led to a set of guiding principles found in Part 2.1 of the draft Islands Trust policy statement. The seven principles range from “acknowledge and respect Indigenous rights” to “foster sustainable, inclusive,and resilient communities,” but none mention agriculture.

Another aspect of the draft policy statement Grimmer finds troubling is that the trust will no longer endorse applications from property owners for new parcels of land to be added to the Agricultural Land Reserve (ALR).

“We’re actually saved by the Agricultural Land Reserve, which allows us the right to farm,” she argues.

Grimmer says that the stock of ALR land in the Gulf Islands is already being degraded by land being swapped out and developed. She wants to see the ALR both protected and expanded.

“We don’t have enough ALR land as it is. We find when it is taken out, it becomes more developed, which should be against what the Islands Trust wants,” she says.

The ALR angle is also a concern for farmer and Salt Spring Island Farmland Trust board member Valerie Perkins.

“While we applaud the commitment to protecting existing ALR land for future food production, there is no mention of making additions to the ALR in the policy statement,” explains Perkins.

Perkins argues that the housing construction emphasized in the policy statement should be matched with increased agricultural capacity.

“The Islands Trust recommends developing clusters of higher-density housing, but these need to be supported by increased food production. There are pockets of rich land outside the ALR that should be set aside to allow for the type of regenerative agriculture that we need to survive and thrive in coming years,” she says.

Preserve and protect

The Islands Trust was founded in 1974 to “preserve and protect” the water and islands between southern Vancouver Island and the mainland by limiting development from spilling over from the nearby urban centres of Vancouver and Victoria.

For John Money, who served on the trust council for 21 years until 2010, the latest draft policy statement is more proof that the trust has lost its way and veered towards imposing a narrow vision of “protectionism” that squeezes out agriculture and industry to the detriment of community wellbeing.

Money argues that the trust’s vision disregards the realities of farming, which involves altering land.

“Let’s say you’ve got a piece of land that could be turned to agriculture, but right now it’s got bush and trees. You’ve got to cut that down, clear it and cultivate it,” he says. “They don’t want that. They want farms to just be pretty greenbelts and return to nature.”

Money argues that there is a “drawbridge effect,” whereby the trust sidelines agriculture and stymies economic activity to preserve an idyllic image of what the islands should be, which leads to islands with a distorted age structure and very little industry.

“You’ve got to preserve the community, too. A healthy community needs a balance of young people and working people and some children, and some people that will help older people,” argues Money.

He’s also concerned that the policy statement is being imposed without sufficient consultation, which he sees as a reflection of a broader top-down approach from the trust.

“Planners are trying to make a cookie-cutter, a one-fits-all. The way the Gulf Islands are made up, all these different communities, you can’t have a cookie-cutter because each community has its own flavour,” he says.

Upon reviewing the draft policy statement, Money found that it was not accommodating of the different character of each island in the trust area.

“A policy statement should be full of words like ‘should’ and ‘it would be preferred.’ And because you’re dealing with at least 13 communities … each one being different, you can’t say ‘shall’ – you should say ‘should,’” he says.

Money argues that the lengthy sections in the draft policy statement devoted to reconciliation with local First Nations reveal a lopsided focus on the part of the trust.

“There’s a preoccupation with reconciliation and the environment, while completely forgetting the most important thing – all the landowners and the taxpayers who are financing it,” says Money.

The BC Ministry of Agriculture and Food is taking a hands-off approach, saying members of the public can communicate any concerns about the draft policy statement to the Islands Trust.

“It is our understanding that the public consultation for the draft policy statement is open until February 2026, so anyone with concerns can fill out the online survey or reach out directly to the Islands Trust council,” the ministry says in a statement to Country Life in BC.

 

All content on this website is copyrighted, and cannot be republished or reproduced without permission.

Related Posts

You may be interested in these posts from the same category.

Farm communities unite for provincial funding

ALC rejects Cowichan dike removal

Council calls for review of farm classification rules

Regulatory hurdles threaten farm income solutions

Islands Trust turns 50

Kelowna fallow farmland returns

ALR policy review shows room for improvement

ALR settles Treaty 8 claims

Surrey ALR inclusion cheered

Good land at risk

There is a future for BC’s apple industry

Province opens ALR to agritech development

Previous Post: « BC farmland values flat
Next Post: Country Life in BC reporting honoured »

© 2026 COUNTRY LIFE IN BC - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED